From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C194DADA7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:22:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2015 07:22:31 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,602,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="742171456"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.243.20.21])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2015 07:22:27 -0700
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:22:25 +0025
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:22:25 +0100
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20150612142224.GA6032@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1434086314-14371-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <557A724F.5090801@redhat.com> <20150612140023.GA6688@bricha3-MOBL3>
 <3193080.9j8deXXLB3@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3193080.9j8deXXLB3@xps13>
Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] rte_ring: remove deprecated functions
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:22:33 -0000

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:15:10PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-06-12 15:00, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 08:46:55AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > On 06/12/2015 08:18 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Also, patch title should be prefixed with "ring pmd" or "drivers/net/ring" rather
> > than rte_ring, since this is a patch for the ring pmd, not the rte_ring library.
> 
> Previously, there was no difference, it was only "ring".
> Prefixes don't include full path nor "pmd".
> Is it really important to make a difference in the commit title between ring lib
> and ring pmd?

Not especially important, no. 

However, if we are going to have prefixes to indicate what component is affected
by a patch, they should at least be unique per component IMHO.

/Bruce