From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D23C5EA for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:28:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hmsreliant.think-freely.org ([2001:470:8:a08:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Z86GJ-0000dI-1I; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:28:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:28:05 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: "Gajdzica, MaciejX T" Message-ID: <20150625122805.GC17026@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <1435088014-18973-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <9CC680510C0AC140A846FED2EF7F962813848240@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9CC680510C0AC140A846FED2EF7F962813848240@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] rte_compat.h : Clean up some typos X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:28:16 -0000 On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 07:37:43AM +0000, Gajdzica, MaciejX T wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman > > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:34 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] rte_compat.h : Clean up some typos > > > > Clean up some macro definition typos and comments > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman > > CC: thomas.monjalon@6wind.com > > --- > > lib/librte_compat/rte_compat.h | 14 +++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_compat/rte_compat.h b/lib/librte_compat/rte_compat.h > > index fb0dc19..75920a1 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_compat/rte_compat.h > > +++ b/lib/librte_compat/rte_compat.h > > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ > > * foo is exported as a global symbol. > > * > > * 2) rename the existing function int foo(char *string) to > > - * int __vsym foo_v20(char *string) > > + * int foo_v20(char *string) > > * > > * 3) Add this macro immediately below the function > > * VERSION_SYMBOL(foo, _v20, 2.0); > > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ > > * char foo(int value, int otherval) { ...} > > * > > * 5) Mark the newest version as the default version > > - * BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL(foo, 2.1); > > + * BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL(foo, _v21, 2.1); > > * > > */ > > > > @@ -79,21 +79,21 @@ > > * Creates a symbol version table entry binding symbol @DPDK_ to the > > internal > > * function name _ > > */ > > -#define VERSION_SYMBOL(b, e, n) __asm__(".symver " RTE_STR(b) RTE_STR(e) > > ", "RTE_STR(b)"@DPDK_"RTE_STR(n)) > > +#define VERSION_SYMBOL(b, e, n) __asm__(".symver " RTE_STR(b) > > +RTE_STR(e) ", " RTE_STR(b) "@DPDK_" RTE_STR(n)) > > > > /* > > * BASE_SYMBOL > > * Creates a symbol version table entry binding unversioned symbol > > * to the internal function _ > > */ > > -#define BASE_SYMBOL(b, e) __asm__(".symver " RTE_STR(b) RTE_STR(e) ", > > "RTE_STR(b)"@") > > +#define BASE_SYMBOL(b, e) __asm__(".symver " RTE_STR(b) RTE_STR(e) ", " > > +RTE_STR(b)"@") > > > > /* > > - * BNID_DEFAULT_SYMBOL > > + * BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL > > * Creates a symbol version entry instructing the linker to bind references to > > * symbol to the internal symbol _ > > */ > > -#define BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL(b, e, n) __asm__(".symver " RTE_STR(b) > > RTE_STR(e) ", "RTE_STR(b)"@@DPDK_"RTE_STR(n)) > > +#define BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL(b, e, n) __asm__(".symver " RTE_STR(b) > > +RTE_STR(e) ", " RTE_STR(b) "@@DPDK_" RTE_STR(n)) > > #define __vsym __attribute__((used)) > > > > #else > > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ > > #define VERSION_SYMBOL(b, e, v) > > #define __vsym > > #define BASE_SYMBOL(b, n) > > -#define BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL(b, v) > > +#define BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL(b, e, n) > > > > /* > > * RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=n > > -- > > 2.1.0 > > This patch doesn't solves the issue with static build. > > You have function: > int foo(int val) > > And you want to create new version of it. So after edit you will have: > int foo_v20(int val) > { > [...] > } > VERSION_SYMBOL(foo, _v20, 2.0); > > int foo_v21(int val1, int val2) > { > [...] > } > BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL (foo, _v21, 2.1); > > You have also external application that uses foo function. You try to compile this app with dpdk > compiled as shared and static. In first case everything will work fine, but in second linker won't > find definition of foo because it doesn't exist. There are only definitions of foo_v20 and foo_v21. > > Best Regards > Maciek > As I noted before, you can avoid that by explicitly making the latest version of the function the static version (that is to say, only rename older versions and allow the 'latest' to be called rte_acl_create (in this case). You're right though, I prefer to rename all functions, and in my example above I didn't address the static build issue. I'm adding a macro for that in my repost. Neil