DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Prathap T <prathap.bgl@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] UIO RTE_INTR_MODE_NONE issue.
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:58:39 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150703125839.52d652c7@uryu.home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMiLLUxOvHWv6UosVf+tyM3CqRwA_+ZSs+-QAKM+vdOC5FUV5g@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 15:37:40 +0530
Prathap T <prathap.bgl@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi:
> 
> 
> 
> If INTX fails, igb_uio falls back to running without IRQ ( refer to the
> implementation in igbuio_pci_probe).
> 
> On QEMU 0.12.0, the INTX seems to have broken, and the intr_mode falls to
> RTE_INTR_MODE_NONE
> 
> However this sets the udev->info.irq = 0;
> 
> 
> 
> Setting of udev->info.irq  to ‘0’ does not work on *2.6.36 and lower
> kernels*, because the UIO_IRQ_NONE is defined as
> 
> 
> 
> #define UIO_IRQ_NONE   -2
> 
> 
> 
> Because the udev->info.irq  is set to ‘0’, on *2.6.36 and below*
> implementation, the *__uio_register_device* invokes request_irq
> 
> 
> 
> if (idev->info->irq >= 0) {
>  ret = request_irq(idev->info->irq, uio_interrupt,
> 
> and it fails with the following dump
> 
> 
> 
> IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ 0
> 
> current handler: timer
> 
> Pid: 3106, comm: dpdk_nic_bind.p Not tainted 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 #1
> 
> Call Trace:
> 
> [<ffffffff810ebd62>] ? __setup_irq+0x382/0x3c0
> 
> [<ffffffffa033f2a0>] ? uio_interrupt+0x0/0x48 [uio]
> 
> [<ffffffff810ec563>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x133/0x230
> 
> [<ffffffffa033f193>] ? __uio_register_device+0x553/0x610 [uio]
> 
> [<ffffffffa0345652>] ? igbuio_pci_probe+0x3a7/0x4a0 [igb_uio]
> 
> [<ffffffff8128e58a>] ? kobject_get+0x1a/0x30
> 
> [<ffffffff812af417>] ? local_pci_probe+0x17/0x20
> 
> [<ffffffff812b0601>] ? pci_device_probe+0x101/0x120
> 
> [<ffffffff8136c992>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x62/0x90
> 
> [<ffffffff8136cc2c>] ? driver_probe_device+0x9c/0x3e0
> 
> [<ffffffff8136bd6a>] ? driver_bind+0xca/0x110
> 
> [<ffffffff8136ae3c>] ? drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30
> 
> [<ffffffff8120a4c5>] ? sysfs_write_file+0xe5/0x170
> 
> [<ffffffff8118e1c8>] ? vfs_write+0xb8/0x1a0
> 
> [<ffffffff8118eb91>] ? sys_write+0x51/0x90
> 
> [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> 
> igb_uio 0000:00:03.0: PCI INT A disabled
> 
> igb_uio: probe of 0000:00:03.0 failed with error -16
> 
> 
> 
> On kernel *2.6.37* and above, the definition is,
> 
> 
> 
> #define UIO_IRQ_NONE   0
> 
> 
> 
> And the check is,
> 
> 
> 
> if (info->irq && (info->irq != UIO_IRQ_CUSTOM)) {
>                ret = request_irq(info->irq, uio_interrupt,
>                                  info->irq_flags, info->name, idev);
> 
> 
> 
> So to handle the ‘RTE_INTR_MODE_NONE’ in these different kernel versions,
> 
> We are proposing the following change to the code in igbuio_pci_probe
> function,
> 
> 
> 
> case RTE_INTR_MODE_NONE:
> 
>                 udev->mode = RTE_INTR_MODE_NONE;
> 
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 37)
> 
>          udev->info.irq = -2;
> 
> #else
> 
>         udev->info.irq = 0;
> 
> #endif


Why not use existing UIO_IRQ_NONE which is defined already.

PS: The DPDK needs to get all its drivers upstream. Supporting multiple kernel versions
is a long term maintance nightmare. Look at KNI if you want an example of how much
of a nuisance this is.

PPS: With DPDK 2.2 it would be good to move the minimum kernel version up to 3.0
since that is what current stable distro's are using.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-03 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-03 10:07 Prathap T
2015-07-03 22:58 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-07-04  3:34   ` Prathap Thammanna
2015-07-04 12:36   ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-06 17:36     ` Stephen Hemminger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-02  3:23 Prathap Thammanna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150703125839.52d652c7@uryu.home.lan \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=prathap.bgl@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).