From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com (mail-pd0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8B92C72 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 19:36:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pddu5 with SMTP id u5so22072948pdd.3 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 10:36:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Q6Fx2rNEkzGwkHjGA6yoO3yE3n7ZJxnzVKAnRsWIIs=; b=IvCnlE8jydoeQvVzWItEW1mU6uLcnkVYtFAJKQpnwv4vk9c0KFhcBeNhOIsq1DGdWR vk0c/hK8wkHAmnvQeWnVunDciTUOAcTnEGVvxseQUnUX5hxfsRRz3WkwaCuNpbUHHZ4G rm1FNDYvUvwvchIrLVq2atcktLzrcllSZwjiJTMZpA/qH8s2eeF06L2F+sNUDtRLMmGj 5dO7pV8uwAxsMjTCOGmRS2Svt/yS5C6EV22V5etGQUiaYsfOhv5KQgslAvO87U3KX1bs bbnD2/fiNuo/i+aTkQm0qUWWkM+f5zLjB0GKU1D6zFDeq/NIGGuPGNp7TIXZmF1P2o6G qm9w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmGRG0OlrTCFk/kvCpvBb8fWjjVrZrq3ZUgi4zsR6N60Jcd2Ls6MGkL1QwDlfZW8S7ZNGUG X-Received: by 10.70.130.144 with SMTP id oe16mr50517pdb.116.1436204181878; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 10:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urahara (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gy3sm18929989pbb.42.2015.07.06.10.36.21 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jul 2015 10:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 10:36:31 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20150706103631.3788f969@urahara> In-Reply-To: <1791248.rusHJ6L7fN@xps13> References: <20150703125839.52d652c7@uryu.home.lan> <1791248.rusHJ6L7fN@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] UIO RTE_INTR_MODE_NONE issue. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:36:23 -0000 On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 14:36:15 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > 2015-07-03 12:58, Stephen Hemminger: > > PPS: With DPDK 2.2 it would be good to move the minimum kernel version up to 3.0 > > since that is what current stable distro's are using. > > Yes, this is something to consider. > Please send a doc patch to open the discussion. Something like?? diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/faq.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/faq.rst index d87230a..715a03c 100644 --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/faq.rst +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/faq.rst @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ Any kernel greater than version 2.6.33 can be used without any patches applied. (not mandatory, but recommended on a NUMA system to support per-NUMA node hugepages allocation) +If starting a new project it worth using the latest stable version of a distribution. +The next version of the DPDK 2.2 will require kernel version 3.0 or later. + .. note:: Blue text in the lists above are direct links to the patch downloads.