From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BF45A59 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:10:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2015 06:10:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,431,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="725039118" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.208.63]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 08 Jul 2015 06:10:35 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:10:34 +0025 Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:10:34 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20150708131034.GA5708@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1435585344-26652-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <1435850194-7024-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <1435850194-7024-8-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <1597388.Dhvyq33s8s@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1597388.Dhvyq33s8s@xps13> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/7] abi: announce mbuf addition for ieee1588 in DPDK 2.2 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:10:43 -0000 On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:16:01PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-07-02 16:16, John McNamara: > > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/abi.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/abi.rst > > Deprecation Notices > > ------------------- > > + > > +* In DPDK 2.1 the IEEE1588/802.1AS support in the i40e driver makes use of the > > + ``udata64`` field in the mbuf to pass the timesync register index to the > > + user. In DPDK 2.2 this will be moved to a new field in the mbuf. > > We need more acknowledgements for this decision, as stated here: > http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/doc/guides/guidelines/versioning.rst#n51 Why can't this new field just be added at the end of cache line 1 (the second cache line) of the mbuf? That would avoid any ABI breakage and would mean we can just put the change in in this release, instead of waiting. /Bruce