From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com (mail-pd0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E39AC3D2 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:44:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pdbqm3 with SMTP id qm3so42406613pdb.0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:44:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4YLs2Diz5TvWxFCp30sGn8KyjmDy8rFGtBNbM5oW35U=; b=VFuQeK+ACdQ/nHgrpob0BZiByR01PIA8UmZLzcUpMhay6E+bTx0LNh+mB4BqFGo8hL 9sOlbtzrFAAqCRB8aJRZ3iC1gozDhScm1s1+j9DzJpYKnoNs+faAIvXKal3brZBGkd0P yKKhYfXE26Sax6MOO2ySyAyrsqLwqlUs7F8+rCySWSgo0CKwO6ziTde9o0N5rbGN+keb YVEjHQV/Eg+hKI/ENykVgx4MOR1YcT8g139BLmy5RnnbAog/NjAYFubwJujkk0Nqf/8Z v2jf+ImQKYq3Tt/Cmdlfrb6H/rWHrmcS1Pm4x4sSm54qF5fi6KeYfydrByVRARJx2U5X 8tZA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnON5zj1ayY9JBCX5GJQsHtK+sDnUMFWIe8n2hjU9MxAnFrvP2D4cZ31rz7WUdBgx6r4a02 X-Received: by 10.66.253.40 with SMTP id zx8mr42954308pac.56.1436543090473; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urahara (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pe3sm9976263pdb.55.2015.07.10.08.44.49 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:44:55 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: <20150710084455.5350892b@urahara> In-Reply-To: References: <1436484387-29273-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <1436484387-29273-2-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio: fix build if build envrionment is on old kernel X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:44:51 -0000 On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:13:41 +0000 "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/compat_vfio.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ > > Wouldn't this need a GPL license header? > > Thanks,Anatoly No. It is perfectly valid to create new headers with different license (at least until SCOTUS changes their mind).