From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F0BC406 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pactm7 with SMTP id tm7so171454471pac.2 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:25:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v/BfiY1/cO1T7xAc9Kza435jkP42WPW2iWFeBIyOZ3U=; b=Kc83X5nvILFZ1QutNIyTusg6O1yRCUL6XOtPYf5ZhcNjhjDbPyM1YajOTQCSGBnbnb /kNN6w6tUzbZEid89nbkraH3PQ0SjyCt5iUTDltWkoelJAbk8U/qq4pUd7eUOSXm/3RH UWnPhHBXEh02623KLFCBt62VThTBTz1OfecL+0qZZUJ5WqstXxaFVyPojODTNTA8g4Dj LVLK3IMzXmbzv1erGwvxGrWdF5XgeUuCRoJosZvt2WHID+fGBacDnKzeBsxMOgb3LPA1 u5cQd+Cpds3jxbmMrOdD1p1qa+N/H9jbabKVIodr8kybW0Rp1BtBaurY6IXAhai8KbMt 6XQw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmwf/BR4RNt23cgrDAC3EmxgKQo5MtgJ4FaLvL2caueeljB38eqQrLAFjWRUltiAtGmaYkf X-Received: by 10.66.132.16 with SMTP id oq16mr44191075pab.89.1436549142379; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urahara (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id iv7sm262796pbc.81.2015.07.10.10.25.41 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:25:51 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20150710102551.4e998ab5@urahara> In-Reply-To: <9514159.N7eeHKzaoJ@xps13> References: <1436463806-2729-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <9514159.N7eeHKzaoJ@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix build with Linux kernel 4.1 or later X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:25:43 -0000 On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:53:51 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-07-09 10:43, Stephen Hemminger: > > From: Stephen Hemminger > > > > The internal API for some functions used by KNI changes in current > > kernel. KNI really needs to be submitted upstream (by Intel) > > to keep it maintainable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > There was already a similar patchset from Miguel Bernal Marin waiting for review: > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/5862 > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/5863 > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/5864 Sure Intel patch is cleaner. But KNI, is heading down an #ifdef rathole.