DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: enable next abi in static libs
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:19:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150711141944.GA10830@neilslaptop.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2F6A77E@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:07:53PM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 2:44 PM
> > To: Thomas Monjalon
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: enable next abi in static libs
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:46:08AM -0700, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Neil, in the meantime, could you please help to check ABI breakage in
> > the HEAD?
> > >
> > Took a look, the only ABI break I see that we need to worry about is the
> > one introduced in commit 8eecb3295aed0a979def52245564d03be172a83c. It adds
> > a bitfield called lro into the existing uint8_t there, but does so in the
> > middle of the set, which pushes the other bits around, breaking ABI.  It
> > should have been added to the end.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is it okay to submit a patch to move it to the end?
> 
Assuming that fixes the problem, I think thats the only thing you can do right
now.  I expect that will work, but I would run it through the ABI checker to be
certain
Neil


> John.
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-11 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-02 22:05 Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-06 13:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-06 13:35   ` Neil Horman
2015-07-06 13:49     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-06 18:22       ` Neil Horman
2015-07-06 21:44         ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-07 11:14           ` Neil Horman
2015-07-07 12:46             ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-07 13:11               ` Neil Horman
2015-07-07 13:44               ` Neil Horman
2015-07-10 16:07                 ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-11 14:19                   ` Neil Horman [this message]
2015-07-13 10:14                     ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-08 14:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] next abi option Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 14:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] mk: remove variables identical to config ones Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 14:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mk: enable next abi preview Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 16:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-13  7:32       ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-13  8:48         ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-13  9:02           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: fix shared lib build with stable abi Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-13  9:24             ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-13  9:32               ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 16:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] next abi option Neil Horman
2015-07-08 22:58     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150711141944.GA10830@neilslaptop.think-freely.org \
    --to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).