From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324223772
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:57:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2015 01:57:18 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,486,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="525243040"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.220.113])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2015 01:57:15 -0700
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:57:15 +0025
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:57:15 +0100
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20150716085714.GA9348@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <20150716121214.GA3103@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com>
 <CALwxeUtvgYRtqV4vFgKAKcJV=EJC2TosOdRgqwQqpAZiSx81Pw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALwxeUtvgYRtqV4vFgKAKcJV=EJC2TosOdRgqwQqpAZiSx81Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@chelsio.com>, Felix Marti <felix@chelsio.com>,
 Kumar Sanghvi <kumaras@chelsio.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Does FreeBSD's nic_uio have bind/unbind interface
 support?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:57:39 -0000

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:57:03AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Rahul,
> 
> (cc Bruce)
> 
> How about removing this "whitelist" from the nic_uio driver and just rely
> on the hw.nic_uio.bdfs parameter to find out which devices to bind ?
>
Yes, that would be my thinking too. It probably should work that way, much as
linux does.

/Bruce

> 
> -- 
> David Marchand
> 
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Rahul Lakkireddy <
> rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It seems that on FreeBSD, nic_uio currently only binds the devices matched
> > in
> > rte_pci_dev_ids.h.  On Linux, it's possible to bind any listed device with
> > igb_uio or vfio.
> >
> > The pci device ids supported by cxgbe PMD, maintained in a table, are not
> > part
> > of rte_pci_dev_ids.h.  Hence, Chelsio T5 cards don't get bound to nic_uio,
> > resulting in probe failure on FreeBSD.
> >
> > On manually adding Chelsio pci device id to rte_pci_dev_ids.h, the Chelsio
> > T5
> > card gets detected fine on FreeBSD.
> >
> > So, we would like to know and understand if adding all supported Chelsio
> > pci
> > device ids to rte_pci_dev_ids.h is the correct way of doing things for
> > FreeBSD?
> >
> > Any suggestions are appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rahul
> >