From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.212.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E87C326
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:48:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so13817278wib.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id
 :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type
 :content-disposition:in-reply-to;
 bh=5muCqFfRVhN+0Fr53IcXaFckSh6hJ1SwI6S8c6QF0S4=;
 b=K54JKosxWITMb4PyOBd1HTVvPdpxKZWIkXAU8dlbIMmR3TLnU+1kzPeijLJS+5ZcyJ
 IaZn0w3ZZ22TbbsItNbxf9t0K5AAhLDEMRyM+V3gh6FGqQ1wCLhkj0m4MraVpbIaMDTZ
 08Wl6qoAGaq6YLABaZh6+8fIqKWso1NxX3r+17Mq8zLymz+9U7ChDqjLHrHY18VWBf5D
 ihPMKh+ZhmUVoYa3sFbUSEHdI8nmIQ9+TfvSqZNOYlUtM0V4kiAIdVeUZMnhP5uLHI7C
 a5pLbuzp8LTa8394JHYNDTEWf1DXTOS7Mgok6tgut7dVhl13uo9dKUGwBTzF3z5q957s
 N1YA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkAyQbpt1GZP661SCPEYBGYWLEcEM6lS98Ay2eNEbWkrQw115wiizcq0GYiU5g2vw7ljXN7
X-Received: by 10.194.103.130 with SMTP id fw2mr14380725wjb.121.1437641308197; 
 Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 6wind.com (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.151.210])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id js3sm6410003wjc.5.2015.07.23.01.48.26
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:48:17 +0200
From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20150723084817.GG4924@6wind.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 helin.zhang@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
References: <1437004212-31646-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1437004212-31646-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: fix tunnel flags check
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:48:28 -0000

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:50:12AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> A packet is tunnelled if the tunnel type is identified or if it has
> an inner part.
> 
> Fix also a typo in RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_MASK.
> 
> Fixes: f295a00a2b44 ("mbuf: add definitions of unified packet types")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>

Makes sense.

Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND