From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3B98D99 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53D8091584; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-83.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.83]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id t8UC3Sn9014682; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:03:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:03:27 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Vlad Zolotarov Message-ID: <20150930150115-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <20150927123914-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <560ABF25.9030300@cloudius-systems.com> <20150929235122-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20150929144616.4e70b44c@urahara> <20150930004714-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <560BBB62.3050502@cloudius-systems.com> <20150930134533-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <560BC6C9.4020505@cloudius-systems.com> <20150930143927-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <560BCD2F.5060505@cloudius-systems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <560BCD2F.5060505@cloudius-systems.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Having troubles binding an SR-IOV VF to uio_pci_generic on Amazon instance X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:03:33 -0000 On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:53:19PM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote: > > > On 09/30/15 14:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:26:01PM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote: > >>The whole idea is to bypass kernel. Especially for networking... > >... on dumb hardware that doesn't support doing that securely. > > On a very capable HW that supports whatever security requirements needed > (e.g. 82599 Intel's SR-IOV VF devices). Network card type is irrelevant as long as you do not have an IOMMU, otherwise you would just use e.g. VFIO. > >Colour me unimpressed. > >