From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5724E6A87 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:27:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D620C8B136; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-83.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.83]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id t91BRpwM029700; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:27:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:27:50 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Avi Kivity Message-ID: <20151001142640-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <20151001113828-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <560CF44A.60102@scylladb.com> <20151001120027-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <560CFB66.5050904@scylladb.com> <20151001124211-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <560D0413.5080401@scylladb.com> <20151001131754-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <560D0FE2.7010905@scylladb.com> <20151001135054-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <560D1705.30300@scylladb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <560D1705.30300@scylladb.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Having troubles binding an SR-IOV VF to uio_pci_generic on Amazon instance X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 11:27:55 -0000 On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:20:37PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > People will just use out of tree drivers (dpdk has several already). It's a > pain, but nowhere near what you are proposing. What's the issue with that? We already agreed this kernel is going to be tainted, and unsupportable.