From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mst@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90A26A87
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  1 Oct 2015 17:11:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26])
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381C0A19B5;
 Thu,  1 Oct 2015 15:11:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-83.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.83])
 by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id
 t91FBtCt023542; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:11:55 -0400
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:11:54 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
Message-ID: <20151001151154.GA24549@redhat.com>
References: <20151001120027-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
 <560CFB66.5050904@scylladb.com>
 <20151001124211-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
 <560D0413.5080401@scylladb.com>
 <20151001131754-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
 <560D0FE2.7010905@scylladb.com>
 <20151001135054-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
 <560D1705.30300@scylladb.com>
 <20151001142640-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
 <560D19C3.4060206@scylladb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <560D19C3.4060206@scylladb.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Having troubles binding an SR-IOV VF to
 uio_pci_generic on Amazon instance
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:11:58 -0000

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:32:19PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >  We already agreed this kernel
> >is going to be tainted, and unsupportable.
> 
> Yes.  So your only motivation in rejecting the patch is to get the author to
> write the ring translation patch and port it to all relevant drivers
> instead?

Not only that.

To make sure users are aware they are doing insecure
things when using software poking at device BARs in sysfs.
To avoid giving virtualization a bad name for security.
To get people to work on safe, maintainable solutions.

-- 
MST