DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Felix Marti <felix@chelsio.com>,
	Kumar A S <kumaras@chelsio.com>,
	Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@chelsio.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] cxgbe: Optimize forwarding performance for 40G
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:36:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151005100620.GA2487@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7tlhbl54cz.fsf@aconole.bos.csb>

Hi Aaron,

On Friday, October 10/02/15, 2015 at 14:48:28 -0700, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> 
> Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com> writes:
> 
> > Update sge initialization with respect to free-list manager configuration
> > and ingress arbiter. Also update refill logic to refill mbufs only after
> > a certain threshold for rx.  Optimize tx packet prefetch and free.
> <<snip>>
> >  			for (i = 0; i < sd->coalesce.idx; i++) {
> > -				rte_pktmbuf_free(sd->coalesce.mbuf[i]);
> > +				struct rte_mbuf *tmp = sd->coalesce.mbuf[i];
> > +
> > +				do {
> > +					struct rte_mbuf *next = tmp->next;
> > +
> > +					rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(tmp);
> > +					tmp = next;
> > +				} while (tmp);
> >  				sd->coalesce.mbuf[i] = NULL;
> Pardon my ignorance here, but rte_pktmbuf_free does this work. I can't
> actually see much difference between your rewrite of this block, and
> the implementation of rte_pktmbuf_free() (apart from moving your branch
> to the end of the function). Did your microbenchmarking really show this
> as an improvement? 
> 
> Thanks for your time,
> Aaron

rte_pktmbuf_free calls rte_mbuf_sanity_check which does a lot of
checks.  This additional check seems redundant for single segment
packets since rte_pktmbuf_free_seg also performs rte_mbuf_sanity_check.

Several PMDs already prefer to use rte_pktmbuf_free_seg directly over
rte_pktmbuf_free as it is faster.

The forwarding perf. improvement with only this particular block is
around 1 Mpps for 64B packets when using l3fwd with 8 queues.

Thanks,
Rahul

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-05 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-02 11:16 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] cxgbe: Optimize tx/rx for 40GbE and add Jumbo Frame support for CXGBE PMD Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-02 11:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] cxgbe: Optimize forwarding performance for 40G Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-02 21:48   ` Aaron Conole
2015-10-05 10:06     ` Rahul Lakkireddy [this message]
2015-10-05 11:46       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-10-05 12:42         ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-05 14:09           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-10-05 15:07             ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-07 15:27               ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-02 11:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] cxgbe: Update device info and perform sanity checks to enable jumbo frames Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-02 11:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] cxgbe: Update tx path to transmit " Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-02 11:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] cxgbe: Update rx path to receive " Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-02 11:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] cxgbe: Allow apps to change mtu Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-02 11:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] doc: Update cxgbe documentation and release notes Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-08 13:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] cxgbe: Optimize tx/rx for 40GbE and add Jumbo Frame support for CXGBE PMD Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-08 13:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] cxgbe: Optimize forwarding performance for 40G Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-08 13:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] cxgbe: Update device info and perform sanity checks to enable jumbo frames Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-08 13:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] cxgbe: Update tx path to transmit " Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-08 13:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] cxgbe: Update rx path to receive " Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-08 13:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] cxgbe: Allow apps to change mtu Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-08 13:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] doc: Update cxgbe documentation and release notes Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-10-20 16:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] cxgbe: Optimize tx/rx for 40GbE and add Jumbo Frame support for CXGBE PMD Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-21  6:14     ` Rahul Lakkireddy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151005100620.GA2487@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com \
    --to=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=felix@chelsio.com \
    --cc=kumaras@chelsio.com \
    --cc=nirranjan@chelsio.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).