From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7674E9E7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:43:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2015 06:43:23 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,689,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="665720027"
Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.208.62])
 by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2015 06:43:22 -0700
Received: by  (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:43:21 +0025
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:43:21 +0100
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Moon-Sang Lee <sang0627@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20151016134320.GE9980@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <CAACK=XfWoMvbvM0cVmeUM1+dotRpjGueyhLMu9PHoQmPr4sQFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAACK=XcmnkOufRfqxM3No8aPBpFWrtaiDq4JcyVh=Dzh+YZKYg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAACK=XcmnkOufRfqxM3No8aPBpFWrtaiDq4JcyVh=Dzh+YZKYg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Q] l2fwd in examples directory
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:43:39 -0000

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:08:57AM +0900, Moon-Sang Lee wrote:
> There is codes as below in examples/l2fwd/main.c and I think
> rte_eth_dev_socket_id(portid)
> always returns -1(SOCKET_ID_ANY) since there is no association code between
> port and
> lcore in the example codes.

Can you perhaps clarify what you mean here. On modern NUMA systems, such as those
from Intel :-), the PCI slots are directly connected to the CPU sockets, so the
ethernet ports do indeed have a direct NUMA affinity. It's not something that
the app needs to specify.

/Bruce

> (i.e. I need to find a matching lcore from
> lcore_queue_conf[] with portid
> and call rte_lcore_to_socket_id(lcore_id).)
> 
>         /* init one RX queue */
>         fflush(stdout);
>         ret = rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(portid, 0, nb_rxd,
>                          rte_eth_dev_socket_id(portid),
>                          NULL,
>                          l2fwd_pktmbuf_pool);
>         if (ret < 0)
>             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "rte_eth_rx_queue_setup:err=%d,
> port=%u\n",
>                   ret, (unsigned) portid);
> 
> It works fine even though memory is allocated in different NUMA node. But I
> wonder there is
> a DPDK API that associates inlcore to port internally thus
> rte_eth_devices[portid].pci_dev->numa_node
> contains proper node.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Moon-Sang Lee, SW Engineer
> Email: sang0627@gmail.com
> Wisdom begins in wonder. *Socrates*