DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Tom Kiely <tkiely@brocade.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about zero length segments in received mbuf
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:00:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151016140002.GH9980@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5620FC5F.30307@brocade.com>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:32:15PM +0100, Tom Kiely wrote:
> Hi,
>     I am currently experiencing a serious issue and was hoping someone else
> might have encountered it.
> 
> I have a KVM VM using two ixgbe interfaces A and B (configured to use PCI
> passthrough) and forwarding traffic from interface A via B.
> At about 4 million pps of 64 byte frames, the rx driver
> ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts_vec() appears to be generating mbufs with 2
> segments, the first of which has data_len ==0 and the second data_len==64.
> The real problem is that when ixgbe_xmit_pkts() on the tx side gets about 18
> of these packets, it seems to mess up the transmit descriptor handling.
> ixgbe_xmit_cleanup() never sees the STAT_DD bit set and no descriptor get
> freed leading to total traffic loss.
> 
> I'm still debugging the xmit side to find out what's causing the descriptor
> ring problem.
> 
> Has anyone encountered the rx side zero-length-segment issue ? I found a
> reference to such an issue on the web but it was years old.
> 
> I'm using DPDK 1.8.0.
> 
> Any information gratefully received,
>    Tom

Hi Tom,

on the TX side, if these two-segment packets are getting sent to the NIC, you
probably want to make sure that the TX code is set up to handle multi-segment
packets. By default in most drivers, the NO_MULTISEG flag is set on queue
initialization.

/Bruce

      reply	other threads:[~2015-10-16 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-16 13:32 Tom Kiely
2015-10-16 14:00 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151016140002.GH9980@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tkiely@brocade.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).