From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C4B8E7A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2015 23:25:56 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,706,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="830967536"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2015 23:25:53 -0700
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:25:59 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20151020062559.GR3115@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1444369572-1157-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <1444369572-1157-10-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4B12E8D3@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4B12E8D3@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "marcel@redhat.com" <marcel@redhat.com>,
 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/13] vhost: add API bind a virtq to a
	specific core
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:25:56 -0000

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:16:23AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 10/9/2015 1:46 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > From: Changchun Ouyang <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
> >
> > The new API rte_vhost_core_id_set() is to bind a virtq to a specific
> > core, while the another API rte_vhost_core_id_get() is for getting
> > the bind core for a virtq.
> Where is the absolute necessity to put switching/application logic into
> vhost virt queue structure?

I don't think it's a must, and we can drop it.

> Besides, suggest seperate vhost example patchset and vhost library
> patchset so that if we have issue with one, it doesn't stop another
> being merged.

That's what I've done: patch 1-8 are for enabling vhost-user mq, while
other patches are for vhost-switch example.  Maybe I should send out 2
patch sets, one for each.

But, anyway, please help focus on reviewing path 1-8.

	--yliu
> >
> > The usage, which will be introduced soon, could be find at examles/vhost/main.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouyang <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
>