From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
Received: from stargate3.asicdesigners.com (stargate.chelsio.com
 [67.207.115.98]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A570B91B7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:14:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com [10.193.185.94])
 by stargate3.asicdesigners.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t9L6EOXi027761;
 Tue, 20 Oct 2015 23:14:25 -0700
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:44:23 +0530
From: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20151021061421.GA6214@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com>
References: <cover.1443704150.git.rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
 <cover.1444303884.git.rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
 <13656397.ba5u1cl15k@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <13656397.ba5u1cl15k@xps13>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Felix Marti <felix@chelsio.com>,
 Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@chelsio.com>, Kumar A S <kumaras@chelsio.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] cxgbe: Optimize tx/rx for 40GbE and
 add Jumbo Frame support for CXGBE PMD
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:14:31 -0000

Hi Thomas,

On Tuesday, October 10/20/15, 2015 at 09:51:07 -0700, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-10-08 19:16, Rahul Lakkireddy:
> > This series of patches improve forwarding performance for Chelsio T5 40GbE
> > cards and add Jumbo Frame support for cxgbe pmd. Also update documentation
> > and release notes.
> 
> Applied, thanks.
> 
> What are the performance numbers with these patches?

Without this patch series, the l3fwd perf with 8 queues for 64B was ~28 MPPS.
With this patch series, the perf has improved to ~31 MPPS.

Thanks,
Rahul