From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF3D5A76 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:59:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2015 00:59:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,203,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="804049360" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2015 00:59:03 -0700 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:00:14 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Tetsuya Mukawa Message-ID: <20151027080014.GF3115@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1445932306-11880-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1445932306-11880-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: Fix wrong handling of virtqueue array index X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 07:59:11 -0000 On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:51:46PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > The patch fixes wrong handling of virtqueue array index when > GET_VRING_BASE message comes. > The vhost backend will receive the message per virtqueue. > Also we should call a destroy callback handler when both RXQ > and TXQ receives the message. > > Signed-off-by: Tetsuya Mukawa Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu Thanks. --yliu > --- > lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c > index a998ad8..99c075f 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/virtio-net-user.c > @@ -283,12 +283,10 @@ user_get_vring_base(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx, > struct vhost_vring_state *state) > { > struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(ctx); > + uint16_t base_idx = state->index / VIRTIO_QNUM * VIRTIO_QNUM; > > if (dev == NULL) > return -1; > - /* We have to stop the queue (virtio) if it is running. */ > - if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING) > - notify_ops->destroy_device(dev); > > /* Here we are safe to get the last used index */ > ops->get_vring_base(ctx, state->index, state); > @@ -300,15 +298,17 @@ user_get_vring_base(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx, > * sent and only sent in vhost_vring_stop. > * TODO: cleanup the vring, it isn't usable since here. > */ > - if (dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_RXQ]->kickfd >= 0) { > - close(dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_RXQ]->kickfd); > - dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_RXQ]->kickfd = -1; > - } > - if (dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_TXQ]->kickfd >= 0) { > - close(dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_TXQ]->kickfd); > - dev->virtqueue[state->index + VIRTIO_TXQ]->kickfd = -1; > + if (dev->virtqueue[state->index]->kickfd >= 0) { > + close(dev->virtqueue[state->index]->kickfd); > + dev->virtqueue[state->index]->kickfd = -1; > } > > + /* We have to stop the queue (virtio) if it is running. */ > + if ((dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING) && > + (dev->virtqueue[base_idx + VIRTIO_RXQ]->kickfd == -1) && > + (dev->virtqueue[base_idx + VIRTIO_TXQ]->kickfd == -1)) > + notify_ops->destroy_device(dev); > + > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.1.4