From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F78B8DA1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:19:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 8206B80C502; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:17:34 -0700
From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
To: "Jastrzebski, MichalX K" <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20151030071734.GA14459@mhcomputing.net>
References: <1445608311-8092-1-git-send-email-michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
 <20151023162033.GA10036@mhcomputing.net>
 <562B209A.6030507@mhcomputing.net>
 <60ABE07DBB3A454EB7FAD707B4BB1582139CCC19@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20151026184046.GA22533@mhcomputing.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151026184046.GA22533@mhcomputing.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] lpm: increase number of next hops for
 lpm (ipv4)
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:19:23 -0000

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:40:46AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> > I can't apply patch 0001-... , could You check it please? 
> 
> I generated it from a rebase of my own copy of DPDK against DPDK upstream 
> master.
> 
> So I'm not sure why it would not apply against latest DPDK master.
> 
> But I will try it and see what could be the reason.
> 
> Matthew.

Hello Michal,

I rechecked it.

The patch does apply perfectly to the latest master branch from 
git://dpdk.org/dpdk using git apply.

Can you take a second look? I compile my DPDK with the clang compiler BTW.

Matthew.