DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
To: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] test: add checks for cpu flags on armv8
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:11:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151030161106.4657232.16920.465@rehivetech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5633798B.2050708@intel.com>

Hmm, I see. It's good to fix this in the generated e-mails between format-patch and send-email calls. I always review those to be sure they meet my expectations ;).

Anyway, it is not clear, what has changed in the v3. Just the rte_cycles? You should explain that at least in the 0000 patch. Better to keep some history in each single commit (are there any rules in dpdk for this? Just look how they do in kernel).

I'll test the patchset in qemu anyway... so will probably send tested-by.

I've put this conversation to mailing list as I cannot see any reason why it is not CC'd there...

Jan Viktorin
RehiveTech
Sent from a mobile device
  Původní zpráva  
Od: Hunt, David
Odesláno: pátek, 30. října 2015 15:07
Komu: Jan Viktorin
Předmět: Fwd: [PATCH v3 6/6] test: add checks for cpu flags on armv8

Jan,
I had gone to the trouble of adding a "Reviewed-by" line in all the 
commit messages for each patch in the patch set, as well as addressing 
the comment about the armv8 files being in the arm dir.
However, the 'git format-patch' seems to have stripped out the
"Reviewed-by" line for some reason.
If you are happy with the latest patch set, could you reply and maybe 
say something like "series Reviewed-by..."?
Thanks for your help in this.
Regards,
Dave.



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] test: add checks for cpu flags on armv8
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:47:06 +0000
From: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
To: david.hunt@intel.com

Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
---
app/test/test_cpuflags.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_cpuflags.c b/app/test/test_cpuflags.c
index 557458f..1689048 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cpuflags.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cpuflags.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*-
+/*
* BSD LICENSE
*
* Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
@@ -115,9 +115,18 @@ test_cpuflags(void)
CHECK_FOR_FLAG(RTE_CPUFLAG_ICACHE_SNOOP);
#endif

-#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM)
+#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
+	printf("Checking for Floating Point:\t\t");
+	CHECK_FOR_FLAG(RTE_CPUFLAG_FPA);
+
printf("Check for NEON:\t\t");
CHECK_FOR_FLAG(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON);
+
+	printf("Checking for ARM32 mode:\t\t");
+ CHECK_FOR_FLAG(RTE_CPUFLAG_AARCH32);
+
+	printf("Checking for ARM64 mode:\t\t");
+ CHECK_FOR_FLAG(RTE_CPUFLAG_AARCH64);
#endif

#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64) || defined(RTE_ARCH_I686)
-- 
1.9.1

       reply	other threads:[~2015-10-30 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1446212826-19425-7-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
     [not found] ` <5633798B.2050708@intel.com>
2015-10-30 16:11   ` Jan Viktorin [this message]
2015-10-30 16:16     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-30 16:28     ` Hunt, David
2015-11-02  6:32       ` Jerin Jacob
2015-11-02 10:47         ` Hunt, David
2015-11-02 13:17           ` Jerin Jacob
2015-11-02 15:04             ` Hunt, David
2015-11-02 15:13               ` Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 15:20                 ` Hunt, David
2015-11-02 15:24           ` Jan Viktorin
2015-10-30 13:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] ARMv8 additions to ARMv7 support David Hunt
2015-10-30 13:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] test: add checks for cpu flags on armv8 David Hunt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151030161106.4657232.16920.465@rehivetech.com \
    --to=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    --cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).