From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8D95A50 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:21:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so154221474pas.2 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:21:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber_org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JCTWaNOlrXLR5kTPVmbEDmUPWKdLz8YOpfFvbg4dHjk=; b=U0BjlWjU8I2ArC5iUHeQ06la5S5hv3YwQFHb4pR09Z4Yv4lCb3Kqen0ZAUB/Y8hyHS j09o+j2O5/ihO1hucgJR4/1PeWvC7qoQfX6dNvyM/j3FJdo//pOzPZqnAAppxFN+d2Cr lWurPMmrijQsqgdUjUvfAjkehW+eSoEUqyi83Vn2GKiKCumo+gzZuY9ONOfjFUF5P8ga wXRn+s0Oxk4Z2ol1W5E+5Tnni7BAHE8XU9y9MOXNXT7DUuN2zqBs43oTWqgQ1Bcgg2th BA4hXl9uSiF5gRtyC2KeC3OnPxt5ESQJ3++358JtAZcr4J5bAybU8Wkdw8sFpTL04PiG eF/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JCTWaNOlrXLR5kTPVmbEDmUPWKdLz8YOpfFvbg4dHjk=; b=XwRQWDHe6Ca2+A+I7wzz0hrCCpr9ib5Y+6JweqpnK1Op3BYlPXAcVOgK0ZAHHctucM +cB47b2mNl0HO26za9bGpx1Mx1s8ObTAF5zGSyExGAiqmQ1syZZsKSiSwX5yKzkgciNY p2GRHa9Aid1ghOMM9mfM5rjP4ToFxWb2RzHovToV70THyRqw6g4GDszu1d2YcDqxVuRn wtSTWvUAqgRYMBulEBAE7VQHFErF6OgdS/m0YUl2XXEW7fp8NM0HLEPwgkPid+Xzd1c9 A5VflhV/TaWFVIZtel+JpyXQzSzHRx+zcHxOvkpV7iYm6zDgLOiDk4eeF2ynRKC3D8sH DcFg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2B1wM8tdx5lTx4uvOC0heREDKHZY+wYmMaQYTgoNWfKgT9Y7xSBtcNA178bRzEZ0epkjZ X-Received: by 10.68.163.195 with SMTP id yk3mr27938695pbb.120.1446484903656; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:21:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jt1sm25014740pbc.83.2015.11.02.09.21.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:21:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:21:53 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Bagh Fares Message-ID: <20151102092153.3b005229@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "CHIOSI, MARGARET T \(mc3124@att.com\)" , "Pradeep Kathail \(pkathail@cisco.com\)" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from project governance meeting at DPDK Userspace (was Notes from ...) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:21:47 -0000 There were two outcomes. One was a proposal to move governance under Linux Foundation. The other was to have a technical steering committee. It was agreed the TSC would be based on the contributors to the project, although we didn't come to a conclusion on a voting model. I would propose that TSC should be elected at regular user summit from nominees; in a manner similar to LF Technical Advisory Board.