From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39A78DA1 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:50:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so154839204pas.2 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:50:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber_org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eZE6IzAMu+Nw9BYWfP6lufwsJCGAJhvYP9seaolfC38=; b=ObI7nyWr48DLiCd27UiWg2u+iZ5nb9q6d069LLFJgAmIsAkDoqMUG66Sztm3ypPdTY blswgze1KfPGZ5HIuPIKLJCsZx36aHkvz+QWEGEoVxlkmWXTr89DsmHssnhwQYyLdxk6 YIaQdq90t178oDs4PrsSpBmyhloUa8QQqV63XRKdTaPBt6qnoUHBWkHyexiRovp99iqJ Z/ZJImeT6pt//sTv/zJFdDkK9ELvDLy2ySMZOb3K+Y31Ww8OBZqenP+rK6HygafqyNlD WwF8GoDY0JiiqY2feu/s//EyAfgCw9MMLRdIGPtYuA87y0HeigTalO8wPDbnT+VjKGfY BWDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eZE6IzAMu+Nw9BYWfP6lufwsJCGAJhvYP9seaolfC38=; b=iKxTsczVK599QSH7AXCJZIXLjX8tDwMx6wmFAYgosytL+jCLVjgQz+oxJQ59iwtDc3 XENHc1j80YEGF2zOqcERxrmnJ+5wEIRmoC3wiTDaViCvoN/egl0hrPdMMT8/t8Kq8L7G QkPLKQgM9z2bFWtlVJechFPj41yjWWji/ttm97+mY4w5TJSlU21Ks6XKTZB82peYzEpw XiHE/YEQaz7++pLqRqChR1tkL6ejRdSpIM5FxctgpG2Lev4hn7DRCcQmL9TR19cs6Soq nod7wgp5zSbAu8T9Kzn+V2Nrsyz2ZzSLRKADJQsf6yJYkFRpCYBXxqnvtrqjeESZYabM fieA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnA6fvqqGDDnxKAH/xB0A7/hs2f1PRIlvWj53K3AtT9TGpoC8LzSKEGj/cEP6XBsAa9cPgT X-Received: by 10.68.245.67 with SMTP id xm3mr27919981pbc.121.1446486600298; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:50:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id vl1sm25169725pbc.31.2015.11.02.09.49.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:50:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:50:11 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" Message-ID: <20151102095011.26c8f978@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674488A2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674488A2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:50:01 -0000 On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:21:48 +0000 "O'Driscoll, Tim" wrote: > At the recent DPDK Userspace event we agreed that we need a body to make technical decisions for the project. In Dublin we referred to this as a Technical Steering Committee, but that term is often used on other projects to describe a body with a more political charter. To avoid confusion, and clarify that the scope of this body for DPDK is purely technical, I propose calling it the DPDK Architecture Board. Great idea. I like good names.