DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Kosar <kosar@rehivetech.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 14/15] mk: Introduce ARMv7 architecture
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:24:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151103102435.GD15320@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56388977.9030206@intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 10:16:23AM +0000, Hunt, David wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 23:47, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> --snip--
> >diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst
> >index be6f827..43a3a3c 100644
> >--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst
> >+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst
> >@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@ New Features
> >
> >  * **Added vhost-user multiple queue support.**
> 
> Jan,
> There's a small issue here. To apply cleanly on the latest head, this line
> needs to be
>  * **Added port hotplug support to xenvirt.**
> 
> Rgds,
> Dave.
The release notes "New Feature" section is always one that causes conflicts on
apply of patches. I think Thomas is ok to handle that on apply, or else we'd all
be constantly rebasing.

For 2.3 we maybe need to come up with a new way to modify this to make applying
patches easier. For example, can the new features section just be pulled from
a set of individual single-bullet-point files inside a directory? Then each new
feature just drops its addition in a new file and there are no conflicts. Can
rst be used to pull into a doc a directory: e.g. "new_features/*.rst"?

/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-03 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-02 23:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/15] Support " Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/15] eal/arm: atomic operations for ARM Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/15] eal/arm: byte order " Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 03/15] eal/arm: cpu cycle " Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 04/15] eal/arm: implement rdtsc by PMU or clock_gettime Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/15] eal/arm: prefetch operations for ARM Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 06/15] eal/arm: spinlock operations for ARM (without HTM) Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 07/15] eal/arm: vector memcpy for ARM Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 08/15] eal/arm: use vector memcpy only when NEON is enabled Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/15] eal/arm: cpu flag checks for ARM Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 10/15] eal/arm: detect arm architecture in cpu flags Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 11/15] eal/arm: rwlock support for ARM Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 12/15] eal/arm: add very incomplete rte_vect Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 13/15] gcc/arm: avoid alignment errors to break build Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 14/15] mk: Introduce ARMv7 architecture Jan Viktorin
2015-11-03 10:16   ` Hunt, David
2015-11-03 10:24     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2015-11-03 11:18       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-03 10:27     ` Jan Viktorin
2015-11-03 11:08       ` Hunt, David
2015-11-02 23:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 15/15] maintainers: claim responsibility for ARMv7 Jan Viktorin
2015-11-03  4:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/15] Support ARMv7 architecture Jerin Jacob
2015-11-03 11:33   ` Hunt, David
2015-11-03 12:32     ` Jacob,  Jerin
2015-11-16 21:33 ` David Marchand
2015-11-18 21:45   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151103102435.GD15320@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=kosar@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).