From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64ED88DA9 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 18:25:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by igbhv6 with SMTP id hv6so39755395igb.0 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:25:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber_org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AlJIGvnrz9G43UyhMFqh7f3/tRviC07GrrvpowWPYd4=; b=wsICfj4NdqHy40PQ36gtKOO1tv6WYegyzbNdxJ60rCwhvfZ4C5lE2kA44GU+sy1y6j JxlnWH62hwsy15Xn7xdMINKUc0udhe7lCvMlzOYjWg6SH217BlWNgRhDh8ASQcOkW7VE /Pzr9xlojyJxCDVBXfNpWE4EW71/PYME4m8gcJitfG3AH6y6bNbupd+uyNSVYuTaRX/f AAKYwlgJxxxKt+DJfBRzDR5X2L2S1/deFHKgArnlOb62l/2GUz4z1S7dqrnXfxp0mbQ0 3rG5OpE1M52JMV7yrMPEuLoUYHKKd3L+ExiWMfug9c04xLcpcvJSpC9ykvF5sTbU+D5p KXtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AlJIGvnrz9G43UyhMFqh7f3/tRviC07GrrvpowWPYd4=; b=DsCQ3M/7zUL1IYVCclsYh3GSVOBjggwFNwByiQsaOLhiXh2oirDP96qOwjRQnbu2mN bcdsqWQ1KpaV9ed1C6o+jcLRCOPVbg8FJRPbUyipR7V+6XpiDb8MgRqjsHuTgvohir4s ePfbwGEDCqgDkkF4MPbNwEPKi312Jcz58CC6RBNA6sf4MlVf2XAUqb5f5K7sDG5ATvcG r7eSmZ68782kiL8zMad8y+ovagm6bZwnq4rD/7YF8ceM2cOtpTL3uF/kqxhd5ZNaQTPk Pm54UM6/Td22XD1+Z3AtDw7N9Q/3k7W5ebUtblZZRPgY8567DVxJoG89F/3igrBczKca MCug== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmYbOwr7rVd8ueO03B2om3Dz7dAR4SnUFWenCKnQLxQWLucMwDL6c7IOmEbu07taRxRYDAh X-Received: by 10.50.138.70 with SMTP id qo6mr1434130igb.41.1446830758839; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:25:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g1sm562245ioe.5.2015.11.06.09.25.58 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:25:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:26:08 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Helin Zhang , , Jesse Brandeburg , "Ronciak, John" Message-ID: <20151106092608.598ba6db@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <20151105091925.0bbb0816@xeon-e3> References: <20151105091925.0bbb0816@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] BUG: DPDK i40e does not work with VFIO X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:25:59 -0000 On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:19:25 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On my machine, i40e will not startup if using VFIO. > > PMD: rte_i40evf_pmd_init(): >> > PMD: rte_i40e_pmd_init(): >> > PMD: eth_i40e_dev_init(): >> > PMD: i40e_set_symmetric_hash_enable_per_port(): Symmetric hash has already been disabled > PMD: eth_i40e_dev_init(): Failed to init adminq: -54 > > The normal Linux driver works correctly. Firmware has been updated to the latest version. > > Like my earlier experience with fm10k, I suspect that Intel never tests i40e with IOMMU, > and only tested with igb_uio. I found the issue. It was a problem with older version of Xen DOM0 patches which were still outstanding in the internal development package.