From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] rte_log.h: add detailed log levels RTE_LOG{FINE, FINER, FINEST}
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:14:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151113191433.GE25051@mhcomputing.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AC8840@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:48:41AM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Actually another question: are existing 8 levels not enough?
> Konstantin
Depends who you ask. I was modeling it based upon the following:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/logging/Level.html
The reason I added a previously-merged patch for a new function
rte_get_log_level() and all these extra levels is that it allows me to do
crazy stuff like this:
if (rte_get_log_level() >= RTE_LOG_FINEST) {
rte_hexdump(stderr, "header_bytes", packet->header.bytes, packet->header.header_size);
}
It is extremely valuable to have levels which go below INFO, so you can make
detailed trace code compiled directly into your app. Which can be readily
enabled or disabled by setting the log_level. WAY easier to debug the early
green-field code in your app when it crashes somehow.
Obviously the first thing you guys will say is... "BUT THAT RUNS WAY TOO
SLOW!!!!!" and you might be right if you are processing 100 gbits/sec. But I
am using DPDK for security not for SDN switching or core routing. And my patch
will not introduce any performance change for the guys doing the other stuff
either.
So if this patch is not accepted in some form, I'd be stuck with my DPDK fork
just for this feature, and the pre-existing patches I sent to Bruce & Co.
regarding rte_lpm and rte_lpm6 expansion and so on.
Matthew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-13 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-13 6:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] librte_eal: allow wider range of log levels Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 6:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] librte_log: add function to retrieve log_level Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 11:40 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-11-13 11:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-13 19:04 ` Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 19:01 ` Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 6:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] rte_log.h: add detailed log levels RTE_LOG{FINE, FINER, FINEST} Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 11:44 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-11-13 11:48 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-11-13 19:14 ` Matthew Hall [this message]
2015-11-13 19:16 ` Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 16:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-13 19:15 ` Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 6:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] eal_common_log.c: reset default level to RTE_LOG_FINEST Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 6:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] rte_log.h: update logging docs to include FINEST level Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 6:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] rte_log.h: add RTE_SYSLOG_LEVEL_MAX Matthew Hall
2015-11-13 6:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] eal_log.c: limit syslog level to RTE_SYSLOG_LEVEL_MAX Matthew Hall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151113191433.GE25051@mhcomputing.net \
--to=mhall@mhcomputing.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).