From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8FCC410 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:15:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D97441A8; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:15:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:15:38 -0500 From: Matthew Hall To: Stephen Hemminger Message-ID: <20151113191538.GF25051@mhcomputing.net> References: <1447397258-27233-1-git-send-email-mhall@mhcomputing.net> <1447397258-27233-3-git-send-email-mhall@mhcomputing.net> <20151113080741.1ed783d0@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151113080741.1ed783d0@xeon-e3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] rte_log.h: add detailed log levels RTE_LOG{FINE, FINER, FINEST} X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:15:39 -0000 On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:07:41AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I understand the motivation but the existing levels match syslog > which are what you want for a production application. > > The new levels are only for developer logs. I don't think we want all > the developer levels beyond debug in the upstream tree anyway. I figured everybody would say this. So then I have to fork DPDK for a trivial aid to coders which doesn't affect performance. This is silly to me. Matthew.