From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E092CC3C2 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:20:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 43D601A8; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:20:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:20:18 -0500 From: Matthew Hall To: Stephen Hemminger Message-ID: <20151113202018.GA28919@mhcomputing.net> References: <20151112140508.79489210@xeon-e3> <20151113184911.GA25051@mhcomputing.net> <20151113113822.1541d4dd@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151113113822.1541d4dd@xeon-e3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Coverity policy for upstream (base) drivers. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:20:19 -0000 On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:38:22AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > It looked like SonarQube was both non-free for doing any real scans, > and the default C rules were oriented towards a completely different > Windows oriented coding style. I was using the free version to do SA dashboad for a team of several hundred previously. But it's possible they made licensing changes since I last used it. If you have any thoughts about better freer dashboards I am all ears. Just trying to get some good tooling in place to deal w/ exponential growth of DPDK code. Matthew.