DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Shaopeng He <shaopeng.he@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] fm10k: fix wrong VLAN value in RX mbuf
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:35:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151120083527.64ffd576@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448028587-7718-1-git-send-email-shaopeng.he@intel.com>

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:09:47 +0800
Shaopeng He <shaopeng.he@intel.com> wrote:

> vlan_tci should be copied from RX descriptor to mbuf,
> and flag PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT should be set for every RX packet,
> this patch fixes this issue.
> Packets in fm10k device always carry at least one VLAN tag.
> For those packets coming in without VLAN tag,
> the port default VLAN tag will be used.
> So in fm10k, always PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT flag is set and vlan_tci
> is valid for each RX packet's mbuf.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaopeng He <shaopeng.he@intel.com>
> ---
> ChangeLog:
> 
> v3:
> * move flag PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT logic together with vlan_tci
> * reword comments
> 
> v2:
> * change flag PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT to always set
> * preserve the priority bits in vlan_tci
> 
>  drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c
> index 1bac28d..e958865 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c
> @@ -104,9 +104,6 @@ rx_desc_to_ol_flags(struct rte_mbuf *m, const union fm10k_rx_desc *d)
>  		(FM10K_RXD_STATUS_L4CS | FM10K_RXD_STATUS_L4E)))
>  		m->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD;
>  
> -	if (d->d.staterr & FM10K_RXD_STATUS_VEXT)
> -		m->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT;
> -
>  	if (unlikely(d->d.staterr & FM10K_RXD_STATUS_HBO))
>  		m->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_HBUF_OVERFLOW;
>  
> @@ -146,6 +143,15 @@ fm10k_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  #endif
>  
>  		mbuf->hash.rss = desc.d.rss;
> +		/**
> +		 * Packets in fm10k device always carry at least one VLAN tag.
> +		 * For those packets coming in without VLAN tag,
> +		 * the port default VLAN tag will be used.
> +		 * So, always PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT flag is set and vlan_tci
> +		 * is valid for each RX packet's mbuf.
> +		 */
> +		mbuf->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT;
> +		mbuf->vlan_tci = desc.w.vlan;
>  
>  		rx_pkts[count] = mbuf;
>  		if (++next_dd == q->nb_desc) {
> @@ -292,6 +298,15 @@ fm10k_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  		rx_desc_to_ol_flags(first_seg, &desc);
>  #endif
>  		first_seg->hash.rss = desc.d.rss;
> +		/**
> +		 * Packets in fm10k device always carry at least one VLAN tag.
> +		 * For those packets coming in without VLAN tag,
> +		 * the port default VLAN tag will be used.
> +		 * So, always PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT flag is set and vlan_tci
> +		 * is valid for each RX packet's mbuf.
> +		 */
> +		mbuf->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT;
> +		first_seg->vlan_tci = desc.w.vlan;
>  
>  		/* Prefetch data of first segment, if configured to do so. */
>  		rte_packet_prefetch((char *)first_seg->buf_addr +

Looks good thanks.

Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-20 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-18  8:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Shaopeng He
2015-11-19  7:05 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-11-20  2:33   ` He, Shaopeng
2015-11-19 17:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-20  2:54   ` He, Shaopeng
2015-11-20  6:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Shaopeng He
2015-11-20 10:35   ` Chen, Jing D
2015-11-20 14:23     ` He, Shaopeng
2015-11-20 14:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Shaopeng He
2015-11-20 16:35     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-11-24 10:28       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151120083527.64ffd576@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=shaopeng.he@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).