From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2561E11A2 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:59:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A6201BB; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 07:59:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 07:59:35 -0500 From: Matthew Hall To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" Message-ID: <20151201125935.GA20658@mhcomputing.net> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674705F1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674705F1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 12:59:36 -0000 On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:50:58PM +0000, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > Increase Next Hops for LPM (IPv4): The number of next hops for IPv4 LPM is > currently limited to 256. This will be extended to allow a greater number of > next hops. In other threads, we previously proposed doing increased LPM4 *and* LPM6. Having incompatible support between both is a huge headache for me. And I already contributed patches to fix the issue in both versions. Thanks, Matthew