From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wes1-so1.wedos.net (wes1-so1.wedos.net [46.28.106.15]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644565939 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:41:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz (pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.13.147]) by wes1-so1.wedos.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pG1KD0Lmlz3qs; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:41:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:40:33 +0100 From: Jan Viktorin To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20151209154033.3259fd35@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> Organization: RehiveTech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] Buildroot support for DPDK 2.2.0-rc3 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:41:20 -0000 Hello, I've posted a new patch set with DPDK support into the Buildroot project: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2015-December/146564.html Patchwork: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554673/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554674/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/554675/ After I integrate the new DPDK install rules and fix some minor issues, I assume that it will be accepted upstream there. Buildroot is useful at least for cross toolchain generation. Regards Jan -- Jan Viktorin E-mail: Viktorin@RehiveTech.com System Architect Web: www.RehiveTech.com RehiveTech Brno, Czech Republic