From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E65C37B2 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:47:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2015 03:47:41 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,426,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="873176140" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2015 03:47:40 -0800 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:47:32 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20151214114732.GB29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1449763652-86292-1-git-send-email-huawei.xie@intel.com> <20151214030158.GA29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <1485514.3e9eA57k0j@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1485514.3e9eA57k0j@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix virtio_net_hdr desc pointing to the same buffer X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:47:42 -0000 On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:32:24AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-12-14 11:01, Yuanhan Liu: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:07:32AM +0800, Huawei@dpdk.org wrote: > > > The virtio_net_hdr desc all pointed to the same buffer. It doesn't cause > > > issue because in the simple TX mode we don't use the header. This patch > > > makes the header desc point to different buffer. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Huawei Xie > > > > Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu > > Does it fix something in the current behaviour? It's more like a logic fixing to me. > I have the feeling it may wait for 2.3. It's been introduced in v2.2, with Huawei's simple tx patchset. Therefore, I guess 2.2 is good to go? --yliu