DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Victor Kaplansky <victork@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4 for 2.3] vhost-user live migration support
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:00:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151214130022.GE18437@pxdev.xzpeter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151214120937.GC29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:09:37PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> It seems that we have exactly the same test environment set up: I have
> one server (where I normally do vhost test there) and one desktop (my
> dev box), 
> 
> On both hosts, there is an ovs bridge, with IP address 192.168.100.1
> assigned manually. Later, I started a VM on the server, and manually
> assigned IP to 192.168.100.10. I then run "ping 192.168.100.1" for
> live migration testing.
> 
> The migration to my desktop somehow works (even though there are some
> bugs in this patch set), however, I did see what Pavel saw: about 12
> packets has been lost, which means about 12 seconds the network is not
> working well.

Hi, Yuanhan,

I _guess_ the problem for ping might be: guest ARP entry for
192.168.100.1 is not updated. Or say, after guest migrated to host2
from host1, guest is still trying to send packet to host1's NIC (no
one is telling it to update, right?), so no one is responding the
ping. When the entry is expired, guest will resend the ARP request,
and host2 will respond this time, with mac address on host2 provided
this time. After that, ping works again.

(not familiar with OVS too, so am just taking it as a "vritual"
switch)

Thanks.
Peter

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-14 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-11  8:26 Pavel Fedin
2015-12-11  9:49 ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-11 10:22   ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-14  3:58     ` Peter Xu
2015-12-14  7:30       ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-14  9:04         ` Peter Xu
2015-12-14  9:46           ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-14 10:09             ` Peter Xu
2015-12-14 12:09             ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-14 13:00               ` Peter Xu [this message]
2015-12-14 13:21                 ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-14 13:28                   ` Peter Xu
2015-12-14 13:51                     ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-14 14:54                   ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-15  8:23       ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-15  8:45         ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-15  8:56           ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-15  9:04             ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-15 10:05           ` Peter Xu
2015-12-15 11:43             ` Thibaut Collet
2015-12-15 11:47               ` Thibaut Collet
2015-12-15 12:24                 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-15 13:36                   ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-15 13:48                     ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-15 13:59                       ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-15 14:58                         ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-16  7:28                           ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-16 11:57                             ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-16 12:08                               ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-16 12:43                                 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-16 13:00                                   ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-15 13:18                 ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-15 15:07                   ` Thibaut Collet
2015-12-15 15:36                     ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-16  2:38                     ` Peter Xu
2015-12-16  2:50                       ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-16  7:05                       ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-15  9:42         ` Peter Xu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-02  3:43 Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-02 14:10 ` Victor Kaplansky
2015-12-02 14:33   ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-09  3:41 ` Xie, Huawei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151214130022.GE18437@pxdev.xzpeter.org \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=victork@redhat.com \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).