From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Received: from wes1-so1.wedos.net (wes1-so1.wedos.net [46.28.106.15])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1364A63
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:35:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz (pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz
 [147.229.13.147])
 by wes1-so1.wedos.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pK4xh5YCbz5MW;
 Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:35:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:34:21 +0100
From: "Jan Viktorin" <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
To: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
Message-ID: <20151214153421.162c15d0@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1450098032-21198-8-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
References: <1450098032-21198-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <1450098032-21198-8-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
Organization: RehiveTech
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 07/13] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always
 return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init()
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:35:05 -0000

I believe, I've already acked this patch. I can see no change here so I
assume it's still the same.

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:30:26 +0530
Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:

> iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
Acked-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>