From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C5337A6 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:23:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 19215419; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:23:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:23:21 -0500 From: Matthew Hall To: Stephen Hemminger Message-ID: <20151214222321.GA21163@mhcomputing.net> References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC358AF758@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <20151214182931.GA17279@mhcomputing.net> <20151214111442.6328dde9@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151214111442.6328dde9@xeon-e3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Morten B Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] tcpdump support in DPDK 2.3 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:23:21 -0000 On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:14:42AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > There are already several BPF libraries available. I would prefer DPDK not > start copying existing code. I didn't copy or reduplicate any code. I was planning to use bpfjit from Alex Nasonov, but a userspace version instead of the kernel one. If somebody makes an shlib version of course I could use that instead. But I didn't hear of one yet. Matthew.