From: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Felix Marti <felix@chelsio.com>,
Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@chelsio.com>,
Kumar A S <kumaras@chelsio.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/3] doc: announce ABI change for filtering support
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:21:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215135136.GA27814@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2837192.XpzTdfrod8@xps13>
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday, December 12/15/15, 2015 at 00:55:20 -0800, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-12-15 14:10, Rahul Lakkireddy:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > I am preparing a v2 of this series where I will be accomodating some
> > more fields to be considered for filtering. However, if the overall
> > approach seems ok to everyone then, should I submit a separate patch
> > for this ABI change announcement ?
>
> Yes, if this announce is not enough:
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=648e6b3815a35
>
Apart from rte_eth_fdir_flow ABI change mentioned in above link, new
fields will be added to rte_eth_ipv4_flow and rte_eth_ipv6_flow,
which break their ABI.
Also, 4 new flow types will be added, which increases RTE_ETH_FLOW_MAX
from 18 to 22 and breaks the ABI.
Should I send a separate ABI change announce patch for each of them?
Thanks,
Rahul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-10 14:01 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/3] ethdev: Enhancements to flow director filter Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-12-10 14:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/3] ethdev: add packet filter flow and new behavior switch to fdir Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-12-10 15:46 ` Chilikin, Andrey
2015-12-11 7:08 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-12-10 14:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/3] testpmd: add an example to show packet filter flow Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-12-10 14:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/3] doc: announce ABI change for filtering support Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-12-15 8:40 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-12-15 8:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-15 13:51 ` Rahul Lakkireddy [this message]
2015-12-15 13:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-23 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/2] ethdev: Enhancements to flow director filter Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-12-23 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 1/2] ethdev: add packet filter flow and new behavior switch to fdir Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-01-13 1:12 ` Wu, Jingjing
2016-01-13 8:49 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-01-13 13:16 ` Wu, Jingjing
2016-01-14 8:48 ` Wu, Jingjing
2016-01-14 13:17 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-01-15 1:30 ` Wu, Jingjing
2016-01-15 7:11 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2015-12-23 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 2/2] testpmd: add an example to show packet filter flow Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-01-11 13:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/2] ethdev: Enhancements to flow director filter Rahul Lakkireddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151215135136.GA27814@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com \
--to=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=felix@chelsio.com \
--cc=kumaras@chelsio.com \
--cc=nirranjan@chelsio.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).