From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83FE593A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:37:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2015 06:37:02 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,437,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="618992771"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2015 06:37:02 -0800
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:37:16 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
Message-ID: <20151216143716.GW29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1450098032-21198-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <1450098032-21198-12-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <20151216132940.GT29571@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <CAAyOgsYr5gx+7gCX=OvPW1AZXX3deUw4GOCTmNwJDCYE1Nx2Cg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAyOgsYr5gx+7gCX=OvPW1AZXX3deUw4GOCTmNwJDCYE1Nx2Cg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Rakesh Krishnamurthy <rakeshk@mvista.com>,
 Rizwan Ansari <ransari@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 11/13] virtio_ioport: armv7/v8: mmap
 virtio iopci bar region
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:37:04 -0000

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 07:50:51PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
...
> >> +     *resource_addr = (void *)((char *)ioport_map + (ioport_map_cnt)*offset);
> >
> > Redundant (), and the void * cast seems to be unnecessary.
> >
> 
> (void *) is unnecessary, but couldn't get the redundant() part?

I meant the () of "(ioport_map_cnt)*offset".

> 
> >> +     ioport_map_cnt++;
> >> +
> >> +     PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "pci.resource_addr %p ioport_map_cnt %d\n",
> >> +                     *resource_addr, ioport_map_cnt);
> >> +     return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> Is it redundant comment or your suggesting to use : r / (void) / __rte_unused?

You should always use __rte_unused instead of (void) cast. Note that you
may need check your other patches, to make sure you not miss other such
usage.

	--yliu