From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com
 [209.85.220.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9158D5947
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:24:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jx14so21016093pad.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:24:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UeBwIo9vja+DgltgtBg4EGYtFLoJBwkb/sxlyl88SWQ=;
 b=nZjbrl4ZGbJvTg8hTIHrOBOeGjp/Bw38p9JJ4qIcRxDjf7dvHm8NLiVb0AP20Wnb+V
 YyANC7uKvHGZRGEXukY9AWQJle15kpZFDt1WdB7eRjEs0OPjziigI/vTtyH5feFKm93I
 Xmkg3eGkGi3HpePkpS+/TCNxvWYEQw06X5T/UjJG94M4Zff6wGVrw6lhAhKLy+BkQwvb
 lPquLK9Raw2U9fi4PiOIkiXtIR167l3HKh2JdoXnMg2t1M0ehySGUZ+JaEelI1i5ei4+
 BmxSMdnOOChvHgSmkv7h1CU4mAARD3n0BacwsiXVtUG1jGraZYs7GUJAy8IVQccTMHmi
 6h7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UeBwIo9vja+DgltgtBg4EGYtFLoJBwkb/sxlyl88SWQ=;
 b=dosLeJrk7qv8lU87Y4ICDmHZFYMVEoyFCEJQoWXXzNbEaL/mpMjC4z7GFEprz8zvOP
 dwarMZM71nMuRQMWMg6oP1SO0GNBUOVCgjqkU1pBX2IMKsqcIl6IL79WP3M/ZyrBSVO3
 dDrMoxl4JC4WixcVPINv1Wz+/kSi97jV2/UI4RW7FpRxU1mtVHDtdASn7CNiaqi1LkWY
 At29aMnRh8CO4h6K355nmesl+2XY/8/rsAZyAmUazRT3ewXLejNJYAzi1MvClWrGaIVf
 nGZbR6kNJxZSLJSsg8Hsa8HOOKmBvdbkQDfIyxaaOz4zNlbTgT9yig5a/SurdHhhnNVl
 AKZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIQaXFAwnQs+2VwjHxWcnRc/m2jgeuhuwSb+WRZu3jeR1CgHnQgvU02oq/u5FPTqm6jOygOs9QDybzqJMKUeS1mxAZXg==
X-Received: by 10.66.124.225 with SMTP id ml1mr575207pab.81.1450394668759;
 Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net.
 [50.53.82.155])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fc6sm17923422pac.44.2015.12.17.15.24.28
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:24:35 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
Message-ID: <20151217152435.3c733ac1@xeon-e3>
In-Reply-To: <CAAyOgsbAyU1VhPCbZ4FjMwkk8OYs8gORP=+rXbmNQOxCX2mvSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1450098032-21198-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <1450098032-21198-2-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <CAAyOgsbAyU1VhPCbZ4FjMwkk8OYs8gORP=+rXbmNQOxCX2mvSQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 01/13] virtio: Introduce config
 RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:24:30 -0000

On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:32:38 +0530
Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
> > virtio_recv_pkts_vec and other virtio vector friend apis are written for sse/avx
> > instructions. For arm64 in particular, virtio vector implementation does not
> > exist(todo).
> >
> > So virtio pmd driver wont build for targets like i686, arm64.  By making
> > RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=n, Driver can build for non-sse/avx targets and will work
> > in non-vectored virtio mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
> > ---
> 
> Ping?
> 
> any review  / comment on this patch much appreciated. Thanks

The patches I posted (and were ignored by Intel) to support indirect
and any layout should have much bigger performance gain than all this
low level SSE bit twiddling.