From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com [209.85.220.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9158D5947 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:24:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jx14so21016093pad.2 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:24:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UeBwIo9vja+DgltgtBg4EGYtFLoJBwkb/sxlyl88SWQ=; b=nZjbrl4ZGbJvTg8hTIHrOBOeGjp/Bw38p9JJ4qIcRxDjf7dvHm8NLiVb0AP20Wnb+V YyANC7uKvHGZRGEXukY9AWQJle15kpZFDt1WdB7eRjEs0OPjziigI/vTtyH5feFKm93I Xmkg3eGkGi3HpePkpS+/TCNxvWYEQw06X5T/UjJG94M4Zff6wGVrw6lhAhKLy+BkQwvb lPquLK9Raw2U9fi4PiOIkiXtIR167l3HKh2JdoXnMg2t1M0ehySGUZ+JaEelI1i5ei4+ BmxSMdnOOChvHgSmkv7h1CU4mAARD3n0BacwsiXVtUG1jGraZYs7GUJAy8IVQccTMHmi 6h7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UeBwIo9vja+DgltgtBg4EGYtFLoJBwkb/sxlyl88SWQ=; b=dosLeJrk7qv8lU87Y4ICDmHZFYMVEoyFCEJQoWXXzNbEaL/mpMjC4z7GFEprz8zvOP dwarMZM71nMuRQMWMg6oP1SO0GNBUOVCgjqkU1pBX2IMKsqcIl6IL79WP3M/ZyrBSVO3 dDrMoxl4JC4WixcVPINv1Wz+/kSi97jV2/UI4RW7FpRxU1mtVHDtdASn7CNiaqi1LkWY At29aMnRh8CO4h6K355nmesl+2XY/8/rsAZyAmUazRT3ewXLejNJYAzi1MvClWrGaIVf nGZbR6kNJxZSLJSsg8Hsa8HOOKmBvdbkQDfIyxaaOz4zNlbTgT9yig5a/SurdHhhnNVl AKZA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIQaXFAwnQs+2VwjHxWcnRc/m2jgeuhuwSb+WRZu3jeR1CgHnQgvU02oq/u5FPTqm6jOygOs9QDybzqJMKUeS1mxAZXg== X-Received: by 10.66.124.225 with SMTP id ml1mr575207pab.81.1450394668759; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:24:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fc6sm17923422pac.44.2015.12.17.15.24.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:24:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:24:35 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Santosh Shukla Message-ID: <20151217152435.3c733ac1@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: References: <1450098032-21198-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <1450098032-21198-2-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ [PATCH v2] 01/13] virtio: Introduce config RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:24:30 -0000 On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:32:38 +0530 Santosh Shukla wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote: > > virtio_recv_pkts_vec and other virtio vector friend apis are written for sse/avx > > instructions. For arm64 in particular, virtio vector implementation does not > > exist(todo). > > > > So virtio pmd driver wont build for targets like i686, arm64. By making > > RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=n, Driver can build for non-sse/avx targets and will work > > in non-vectored virtio mode. > > > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla > > --- > > Ping? > > any review / comment on this patch much appreciated. Thanks The patches I posted (and were ignored by Intel) to support indirect and any layout should have much bigger performance gain than all this low level SSE bit twiddling.