From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com (mail-pf0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90DF93D8 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:38:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 78so227697900pfw.2 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:38:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uoSg5eECqX4JHNr7P2DC9tcUJ5kwfYh9GQjmC0rsYDw=; b=sR5M7gzWklrOdOFxPz7rLgc2O8XVX3BpiRhCQqIMNO5JMWx16UN42FzcKbrl12c6w2 vwDH8YcMMKZYNp9n/RrH8RAJf/FLUYfTbaCmjqeQOy6P3MoAM5hpEV8KWtFFgLk3yjPE FQstsEtb0vFB004Pzi+LmBInLXM04CsGA0wXQqQ7mlkSrh9Q6FQHmuf7Eje3m9Im9GLs k1kgizMCllUPwec7lIOFmxEj+g5LeOlDh47m1dPOHApNw9c0JtUISiyC8lhlIICSxglR 0BWIO96MGK05dTpiDxjB2MyhEMYvk6C/zlrer04PhSM9Xl1kgrceiJvsXs2EREF7AaW3 wSOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uoSg5eECqX4JHNr7P2DC9tcUJ5kwfYh9GQjmC0rsYDw=; b=B39POuixhFmbMrkXSL/bpjopYdAasxwFyXjVJDJVboNW76mk9HKFN35x112Sr6ljfW mUZP939Cp4HtadCi/JLuBGPfVXTLzaptqqpyGdiW4pPP8OY6J7qIbO8vxeLnJhIVDo4f ZauIbsda/rm9sXVmtrai8OfQMz6rZL51KmDHmh+C1ZT0k8EQHZHIYRyRvoUKP9smFuaD haIDVrMEaRfCVJO1leoMYiT2Jt6IHW8RFOP5at4IvEQPhaA4DXCUvpHAkhzCdGJE1X7Z Hrq37lw8qjwtkoKu6B/u8zR78oa7Q3ALktT5SArUAC8ZYbMDYY9xODKC5W/zKBnJ25F8 3ZCA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk4JjjS9gOkLkKQ3POVwp/24xZOTjhMujzwEJCJE9sqTHccoNKmerWhNVZF7HtyMsDYKo1ufWLnpCT4Sx0vdFOuZW+bgg== X-Received: by 10.98.89.210 with SMTP id k79mr114553366pfj.45.1452022682164; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:38:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.82.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u26sm79284073pfa.86.2016.01.05.11.38.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:38:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:37:23 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20160105113723.6d2b85e5@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] time to kill rte_pci_dev_ids.h X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 19:38:03 -0000 Has anyone looked at getting rid of rte_pci_dev_ids.h? The current method with #ifdef's and putting all devices in one file really doesn't scale well. Something more like other OS's where the data is only in each device driver would be better.