DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] vmxnet3: restore tx data ring support
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:50:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160112205022.118c3423@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6EDC655B-0C21-4C63-997D-87BD2B35BAEB@vmware.com>

On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 02:20:01 +0000
Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com> wrote:

> >Good idea to use a local region which optmizes the copy in the host,
> >but this implementation needs to be more general.
> >
> >As written it is broken for multi-segment packets. A multi-segment
> >packet will have a pktlen >= datalen as in:
> >  m -> mb_segs=3, pktlen=1200, datalen=200  
> >    -> datalen=900
> >    -> datalen=100  
> >
> >There are two ways to fix this. You could test for nb_segs == 1
> >or better yet. Optimize each segment it might be that the first
> >segment (or tail segment) would fit in the available data area.  
> 
> Currently the vmxnet3 backend has a limitation of 128B data area so
> it should work even for the multi-segmented pkt shown above. But
> I agree it does not work for all multi-segmented packets.  The
> following packet will be such an example.
> 
> m -> nb_segs=3, pktlen=128, datalen=64
>     -> datalen=32
>     -> datalen=32  
> 
> 
> It’s unclear if/how we might get into such a multi-segmented pkt
> but I agree we should handle this case.  Patch updated taking the
> simple approach (checking for nb_segs == 1).  I’ll leave the
> optimization as a future patch.

Such a packet can happen when adding a tunnel header such as VXLAN
and the underlying packet is shared (refcnt > 1) or does not have
enough headroom for the tunnel header.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-13  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-06  0:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] vmxnet3 TSO and tx cksum offload Yong Wang
2016-01-06  0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] vmxnet3: restore tx data ring support Yong Wang
2016-01-06  0:48   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-01-13  2:20     ` Yong Wang
2016-01-13  4:50       ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2016-01-06  0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] vmxnet3: add tx l4 cksum offload Yong Wang
2016-01-06  0:51   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-01-13  2:20     ` Yong Wang
2016-01-06  0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] vmxnet3: add TSO support Yong Wang
2016-01-06  0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] vmxnet3: announce device offload capability Yong Wang
2016-01-06  0:52   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-01-13  2:20     ` Yong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160112205022.118c3423@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=yongwang@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).