From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com (mail-pf0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.192.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6497A6A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:49:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id e65so84167126pfe.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:49:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UpMpsDO3rAyrJR4WGzz6aQeY4RNxcde7CF1aPaRpdg4=;
 b=met1Ad9Rhcs7QNY4+evW4PXFl85nQ3pamnS4A5S2HLfw39HrZdrqsr5mqXHynBoJs+
 ogAhc2FqurFq1GB9Z3pMl6dG6XlvsZIvZ0uUzLONlXLf6W7zu6Lx5z/+ovbi+vNF4cOo
 EdNL4Qp0r1kzFwAQDAZfQnZRiDeTCbTZeASCyGvLGvTONwTIoGpjal4J7XXpr7ED+Im+
 iPSbyiso6PIPaYxOvFDXfwj2dKcQGCa0m91djJ/f+KMsTC1UQB8IRscwM1nGT0tolrY7
 SB/JJtpclfaVsmTRHlX0qol/fD6TDcmDnNJC5qhKK8HasN5gXwWj0ScZvbhdRtPrMviu
 ps5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UpMpsDO3rAyrJR4WGzz6aQeY4RNxcde7CF1aPaRpdg4=;
 b=EsBICnuHSSl+bGKGOB77RB5lNXgR+XOfeOWDR1PSGtJQQSm/JnAQIZWbSMaqG+mPhm
 KZAFwGjYHQg7JusXAETluRWRkdEdjEOEBDlflzJFFmHLzMS+cpPKY2poFPHzYkpLvgr8
 UREBdyoGCkrbAWB6NMpFX1Y3OGNVZNZrRrm2JTjGqHnbAYyjos4sM9X6/l7Vh+sCd8rk
 Wh2t2PfAigJqRrojX28vXGK8/jFEWBHN4acVHVXf8hlyc3n5aAeWXsVu7+YTBH1sSpMH
 7urJxKELb8NQnuc03T29gTvoQux+qTBtMxXTRgBP3D00XWFz2RxL9BOrdUAULwhASssl
 Qmng==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlTCN0VcRYjmwlcCDANIhXTnlOCd14O7CGbHjLIAyERl7iC9Jq7WauPmXyxOaIwBIdxvL79QEGgeIo1ETK183NA+6x4Ow==
X-Received: by 10.98.68.211 with SMTP id m80mr43910426pfi.117.1452703790106;
 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net.
 [50.53.82.155])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lq10sm3738245pab.36.2016.01.13.08.49.49
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:49:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:49:59 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20160113084959.797beea5@xeon-e3>
In-Reply-To: <20160113150708.GD7756@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1452671929-29617-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <20160113150708.GD7756@bricha3-MOBL3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: coding style: use linux kernel style
 for indentation
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:49:51 -0000

On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:07:08 +0000
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> So, while the two-tab indent may look "a bit weird" it does solve the two issues
> above. I believe practical benefits should override initial impressions. [It took
> me a while to get used to also, but now I very much like it as a style.]

I don't think that deviating from kernel style for this case is justified.