From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A735A8E5E for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 18:33:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 310FD138; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:33:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:33:14 -0500 From: Matthew Hall To: Zoltan Kiss Message-ID: <20160115173314.GA29578@mhcomputing.net> References: <56992433.7060206@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56992433.7060206@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Sending and receiving on the same port at the same time, from different threads X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:33:14 -0000 On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:54:11PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote: > Can you call rte_eth_tx_burst() and rte_eth_tx_burst() on the same port at > the same time from different threads? In general, yes you can. I did this before in an L4-L7 performance tester, so cores could concentrate on RX or TX to keep the speeds high. > Have anyone seen a device where it wasn't true? Not specifically. But I didn't go looking for one either. Matthew.