From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610EA91B2 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 03:48:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1DC714C; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:48:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:48:26 -0500 From: Matthew Hall To: Arnon Warshavsky Message-ID: <20160123024826.GB25867@mhcomputing.net> References: <56A07267.2060001@mhcomputing.net> <04C50E6A-7E6F-410F-8D07-619766863227@intel.com> <0B797DEE-FCB2-4CE0-B3A3-86560BA3ADA5@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PKTGEN] additional terminal IO question X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 02:48:27 -0000 On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 05:35:00PM +0200, Arnon Warshavsky wrote: > Keith, > For the record, on my end (can only speak for myself) this is not a real > problem. > I work around it by using a different theme and live with it happily ever > after. > I just provided the input since I encountered it. > > /Arnon For me, breaking stuff with a black background to gain questionably useful colors and/or themes seems like more overhead for cognition of the code for not much benefit. This is going to break the tool people who use a Linux standard framebuffer with no X also, isn't it? Matthew.