From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19DE8D94 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:21:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03490411; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:21:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:21:21 -0800 From: Matthew Hall To: Nikita Kozlov Message-ID: <20160201212121.GA17493@mhcomputing.net> References: <20151030120018.GA4904@bricha3-MOBL3> <20151030175927.GA21104@mhcomputing.net> <20151030215516.GA12128@bricha3-MOBL3> <20151030222524.GA23508@mhcomputing.net> <56AEAC11.602@gandi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56AEAC11.602@gandi.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] lpm patches X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 21:21:22 -0000 On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:51:29AM +0100, Nikita Kozlov wrote: > Hello, > I wanted to know if there was something new or if I can help on this topic ? > I'm using rte_lpm in a project so I may (at least) do some tests or reviews. If you search the archive of the list some patch came out recently which is some help. But sadly won't help much for me as it is IPv4 only so I'll be sticking with my existing set that does IPv4 and IPv6. Matthew.