From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCD495CC for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 02:52:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2016 17:52:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,383,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="40630438" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2016 17:51:59 -0800 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:53:27 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: "Iremonger, Bernard" Message-ID: <20160202015327.GF4257@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1450321921-27799-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <1454043483-24579-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219FACE1C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219FACE1C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "dev@dpdk.org" , Victor Kaplansky Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] vhost-user live migration support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 01:52:04 -0000 On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:54:05PM +0000, Iremonger, Bernard wrote: > Hi Yuanhan, > > > > > A simple test guide (on same host) > > ================================== > > > > The following test is based on OVS + DPDK (check [0] for how to setup OVS + > > DPDK): ... > > The above test guide should probably be added to the DPDK doc files. > It could be added to the sample app guide or the programmers guide. > There is already a Vhost Library section in the programmers guide and > a Vhost Sample Application section in the sample app guide. Hi Iremonger, You had same ask in my last version, and I was aware of that while preparing this version. The reason I didn't include it is the same as I replied to you last time: it's a very rough test guide; the formal test guide would be with 2 hosts, and also you have to establish a connection to the VM before migration and make sure it still works right after the migration. So, I will consider to add such formal test plan after validation is done from validation team. > The Vhost Sample Application section might be the best place to add it. I don't think that's the right place: we can't do the live migration test with the vhost-switch example: it includes some hardware features, such as VLAN. Those info would be lost after migration. And that's the reason I choose OVS. > > It would be useful to add some documentation on the Vhost Logging feature Itself. Good suggestion; I will think what I can do for it. --yliu