From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Received: from wes1-so2.wedos.net (wes1-so2.wedos.net [46.28.106.16])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51599559C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  8 Feb 2016 13:55:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz (pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz
 [147.229.13.147])
 by wes1-so2.wedos.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pzS5700ftz1dQ;
 Mon,  8 Feb 2016 13:55:38 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:56:59 +0100
From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Message-ID: <20160208135659.65468869@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20160208105216.GA14217@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1450067576-18803-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
 <1454053555-28850-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
 <20160208093157.GF10260@localhost.localdomain>
 <20160208112430.4cbc543a@jvn>
 <20160208105216.GA14217@localhost.localdomain>
Organization: RehiveTech
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix performance/cache resource issues
 with 128-byte cache line targets
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:55:39 -0000

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:22:17 +0530
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:24:30AM +0100, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> > Hello Jerin,
> >
> > I failed to apply the v4 series. I've tried multiple bases. The v3
> > applied successfully to v2.2.0-rc4. Could you give the proper working
> > base?  
> 
> Hello Jan,
> 
> Please apply the depended "config: cleanup existing RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
> selection scheme" patch first as mentioned in the cover letter.
> 
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/9388/

Sorry, I've missed that note. Somebody should standardize dependency
specifications... It applies and builds well now.

Regards
Jan

> [snip]