From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009AD592A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:53:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2016 21:53:17 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,449,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="912486806"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2016 21:53:17 -0800
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:57:06 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Rich Lane <rich.lane@bigswitch.com>
Message-ID: <20160215055706.GA21426@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1455132428-46926-1-git-send-email-rlane@bigswitch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1455132428-46926-1-git-send-email-rlane@bigswitch.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: remove vhost_net_device_ops
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:53:19 -0000

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:27:08AM -0800, Rich Lane wrote:
> The indirection is unnecessary because there is only one implementation of the
> vhost common code. Removing it makes the code more readable.

This is a good cleanup! A minor nit is that I saw few long lines
exceeding 80 chars.

	--yliu