From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D097337A6 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:50:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2016 02:50:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,455,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="747172542" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.208.63]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2016 02:50:03 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:50:02 +0025 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:50:02 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Wang Xiao W Message-ID: <20160216105002.GC21696@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1453372561-11431-16-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> <1453866647-16215-1-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> <1453866647-16215-2-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453866647-16215-2-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/16] fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for pf X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:50:07 -0000 On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:50:32AM +0800, Wang Xiao W wrote: > The new share code makes fm10k_msg_update_pvid_pf function static, so we can > not refer to it now in fm10k_ethdev.c. The registered pf handler is almost the > same as the default pf handler, removing it has no impact on mailbox. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Xiao W While the patch itself looks ok, checkpatch gives a warning about the commit message being too long. WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line) #6: The new share code makes fm10k_msg_update_pvid_pf function static, so we can total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 31 lines checked Since the next patch breaks compilation, a V3 will be needed, so please fix this warning in the process. I'd also ask that you run checkpatch on all patches before submitting and fix any issue raised. Thanks, /Bruce