From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60032C1C0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:08:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2016 20:08:49 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,463,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="748434124"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49])
 by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2016 20:08:48 -0800
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:09:13 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20160218040913.GM21426@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1449122773-25510-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <111992201.GYQ3cgQmjX@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <111992201.GYQ3cgQmjX@xps13>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Victor Kaplansky <vkaplans@redhat.com>,
 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5 for 2.3] vhost rxtx refactor
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 04:08:50 -0000

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:50:22PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
> 
> 2015-12-03 14:06, Yuanhan Liu:
> > Vhost rxtx code is derived from vhost-switch example, which is very
> > likely the most messy code in DPDK. Unluckily, the move also brings
> > over the bad merits: twisted logic, bad comments.
> > 
> > When I joined this team firstly, I was quite scared off by the messy
> > and long vhost rxtx code. While adding the vhost-user live migration
> > support, that I have to make fews changes to it, I then ventured to
> > look at it again, to understand it better, in the meantime, to see if
> > I can refactor it.
> > 
> > And, here you go.
> 
> There were several comments and a typo detected.
> Please what is the status of this patchset?

Hi Thomas,

It was delayed; and I will address those comments and send out a new
version recently.

	--yliu