From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com (mail-pf0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.192.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8B75690
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:00:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x65so73957385pfb.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:00:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=alfxnWKyR1tEqt07iQPZsv1Y35PmdPUxB6RpGEEYwZM=;
 b=uPXvrF35OyWdmLpnpe7R5PcKXJPgxjEsF17Ym5PFFNTFtS4H2ogYhiaHgGxsOvysl8
 e73gvfW3gGpX3EUK2jr3ID+WXY0aNJv+FEvow3oH7t5iKv90JsMITQzyS51vluZS25CX
 XE//PRZRLp/SpLlpCJ9lN4SwhryCgOALPbA0epzYo2RC9+Obx5wRQ7p5vXTH5gw2QOZz
 kCLRwQJDvKyc/fZ1hnKDax1ufbv7vlNc1AhbLXdyZhLwFSG0thY8uInue2AwgthBzFIa
 KMiINzKx+NXAX3DwZTmfjO4s3tl3neI76Ibk2mnc8W437oLPRZUXH843dmiVCSYIWzGB
 bTWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=alfxnWKyR1tEqt07iQPZsv1Y35PmdPUxB6RpGEEYwZM=;
 b=kFJlqwFcR/LPAp9hECFUSHUps5R9bvjZQqHupSx4iM1vmTj25j8+ciBdI9/xfVIq82
 TNSpHQ2HJ/Fk8OSTVWdlm7tpOXnqjcm52oD2DzOTGzVsrYkfwD7KADixi2kHBBn0qNZa
 QzSUUN88Vok19lTmSJvn743j37TCTcszxSxNtqsmwzPSWyu29sz3RbrPj5HDehcYT1Ea
 CJZuL4Azpqb0uJRzRDVTd9mQP8JyBuVs/4665MN1RB4U0i912zdXAGPIHnUNaarjEEOO
 8EuNOjAMYZt/zU9nOx2oYD9sxrNLuCB8PDkbbtC669cKuP/aVUbSQf8rhVrwvAnIfbzE
 sdnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSHbNqppQkyX8GuZZvqRlxbHgv1USRnNSnk0lRNVYraERxJmAh5D39JdFAZhCJzIg==
X-Received: by 10.98.66.75 with SMTP id p72mr28742190pfa.50.1456016817958;
 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net.
 [50.53.82.155])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c9sm26922375pfd.90.2016.02.20.17.06.57
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:07:08 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20160220170708.37d0db29@xeon-e3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] KNI - issues
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 05:00:32 -0000

Is anyone working on making KNI conform to current kernel best practices
and attempt to get it upstream?  After 2 minute code review I already
see lots and lots of things that need work.